Ex Parte Rebhorn et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.          

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                     
                                     ____________                                   
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                        
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                 
                                     ____________                                   
                     Ex parte JOHN P. REBHORN, STEPHEN P. BELKO                     
                                 and PAMELA A. HODULIK                              
                                     ____________                                   
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1815                               
                              Application No. 09/781,582                            
                                     ____________                                   
                                       ON BRIEF                                     
                                     ____________                                   
         Before WALTZ, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.            
         KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                
              This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                
         rejection of claims 1-51, which are all of the claims pending in           
         this application.                                                          
                                     BACKGROUND                                     
              Appellants' invention relates to a portable, single-use               
         container and method of manufacturing same.  An understanding of           
         the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims            
         1, 35 and 38, which are reproduced below.                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007