The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MAURICE S. BROOKHART, LYNDA KAYE JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER
MOORE KILLIAN, SAMUEL DAVID ARTHUR, JERALD FELDMAN, ELIZABETH
FORRESTER MCCORD, STEPHAN JAMES MCLAIN, KRISTINA ANN KREUTZER,
ALISON MARGARET ANNE BENNETT, EDWARD BRYAN COUGHLIN, STEVEN DALE
ITTEL, ANJU PARTHASARATHY, and DANIEL JOSEPH TEMPEL
__________
Appeal No. 2004-1829
Application No. 09/887,273
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, KRATZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
(2003) from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 563 through
574, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified
application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to a process for the
production of a polyolefin having at least 50 branches per 1000
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007