Ex Parte HORNBACK III et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2004-1854                                                        
          Application No. 08/971,851                                                  


          preventing exhaust gas from bypassing the pollution control                 
          element, said sheet material having major top and bottom surfaces,          
          a thickness, a length, and a width corresponding to a direction of          
          exhaust gas through the device, said sheet material having at least         
          one score-line in the major top surface and across the entire width         
          of said sheet material to relieve enough surface tension in said            
          sheet material that, when said sheet material is disposed around            
          the curvature of said pollution control element, cracking or                
          breaking of said sheet material that would otherwise occur is               
          avoided.                                                                    
               The examiner has relied upon the following references as               
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Corn                        5,332,609          Jul. 26, 1994                
          Kitamura et al. (JP ‘916)   61-89916           May 8, 1986                  
          (published Japanese kokai patent application)                               
          Kusada et al. (JP ‘313)     02-061313          Mar. 1, 1990                 
          (published Japanese kokai patent application)3                              
               The following rejections are before this panel for review in           
          this appeal:                                                                
               (1) claims 12-16, 18-20, 23-25, 27-28, 34, 36-38 and 42-47             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over                
          JP ‘916 (Answer, page 4);                                                   
               (2) claims 19-20 stand rejected under section 103(a) as                
          unpatentable over JP ‘916 in view of JP ‘313 (Answer, page 5);              


               3We rely upon and cite from full English translations of the           
          JP ‘916 and JP ‘313 documents, previously made of record                    
          (translations listed as PTO 99-3188 and PTO 99-3034,                        
          respectively).                                                              
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007