Appeal No. 2004-1869 Application No. 09/738,591 INTRODUCTION The claims are directed to a method for making a film for use with a heat transfer component. Claims 1, 5, 7, and 21 are illustrative: 1. A method for making a film for use with a heat transfer component comprising the steps of: applying a plurality of polar particulates to a surface of a film; then adhering said plurality of polar particulates to said surface of said film; and then adding said film to said heat transfer component. 5. The method as recited in claim 1 further including the step of applying an adhesive substance to said surface of said film, and wherein the step of adhering said plurality of polar particulates comprises pressing said plurality of polar particulates into said adhesive substance. 7. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising the step of coating an outer surface of said plurality of polar particulates with a coating. 21. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said plurality of polar particulates are one of alumina, zirconia, wollastonite, talc, and titanium dioxide. As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies upon the following prior art references: McCulloch et al. (McCulloch) 3,973,510 Aug. 10, 1976 Kaneko et al. (Kaneko) 4,421,789 Dec. 20, 1983 Bentley 4,848,314 Jul. 18, 1989 Hayakawa et al. (Hayakawa) 6,013,372 Jan. 11, 2000 Linford 6,132,801 Oct. 17, 2000 The specific rejections are as follows: 1. Claims 1-4, 20, 22, 23, 26 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Bentley in view of Kaneko (Answer, pp. 3-4). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007