Appeal No. 2004-1892
Application No. 10/197,472
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 27, a copy of which
appears in the APPENDIX to the main brief (Paper No. 10).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Muhlberger 4,815,410 Mar. 28, 1989
Vadney 5,839,388 Nov. 24, 1998
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 27, 31, and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Muhlberger in view of Vadney.
The full text of the examiner's obviousness rejection and
response to the argument presented by appellants appears in the
final rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 6 and 11), while the
complete statement of appellants' argument can be found in the
main and reply briefs (Paper Nos. 10 and 12).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007