The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GRZEGORZ JANISZEWSKI and JAN CHRISTIAN HOLMSTROM
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1895
Application No. 09/681,515
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 20, all of the claims in the application.
Appellants’ invention addresses a vehicle differential and
an arrangement for a vehicle differential. A basic understanding
of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary
claims 1 and 10, respective copies of which appear on pages 9
through 12 of the main brief (Paper No. 17).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007