Appeal No. 2004-1908
Application No. 09/176,374 Page 10
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 5, 6, 8, 9 and
16-18 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph as being indefinite
for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the
subject matter which applicant regards as invention; and to
reject claims 1-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Machida in view of Takeuchi is reversed.
REVERSED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007