Appeal No. 2004-1926
Application 09/714,670
examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness of
the appellant’s claimed process. Accordingly, we reverse the
examiner’s rejection.
DECISION
The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-10, 22
and 23 over Zaremski or Lovejoy, each in view of the McGraw-Hill
Dictionary and the Handbook of Metal Treatments and Testing,
claims 27-29 over Zaremski in view of the McGraw-Hill Dictionary
and the Handbook of Metal Treatments and Testing, and claims 1,
11-21 and 24-26 over Kiyo in view of the McGraw-Hill Dictionary
and the Handbook of Metal Treatments and Testing, are reversed.
REVERSED
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007