The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN C. WARDLAW
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1944
Application No. 09/255,673
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 32-47. Claims 1-31, which are all of the
remaining claims pending in this application, have been withdrawn
from further consideration by the examiner as drawn to a non-
elected invention.
BACKGROUND
Appellant's invention relates to a method for testing
biologic fluid samples. An understanding of the invention can be
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007