Ex Parte Farris - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2004-1945                                                               Page 2                
              Application No. 09/524,213                                                                               


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                     The appellant's invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for storing                 
              a dry substance, activating the substance with liquid and subsequently transferring the                  
              substance from storage into a syringe or cannula without the need for a needle.  More                    
              particularly, the appellant's invention relates to a storage container for storing a                     
              substance that has undergone a lyophilization process and is ready for the introduction                  
              of a liquid to dissolve the lyophilisate into a medium that may be then utilized according               
              to its appropriate prescription (specification, p. 2).  A copy of the claims under appeal is             
              set forth in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                                                      


                     Claims 24 to 38 and 41 to 48 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                     
              anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 5,716,3461 to Farris.                                                     


                     Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                     
              the appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference to the final                        
              rejection (Paper No. 13, mailed March 17, 2003) and the answer (Paper No. 17, mailed                     
              January 8, 2004) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejection, and                  
              to the brief (Paper No. 16, filed November 24, 2003) for the appellant's arguments                       
              thereagainst.                                                                                            

                     1 Issued February 10, 1998.                                                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007