The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JORG HOFMANN, PRAMOD GUPTA, MANFRED DIETRICH,
HANS JURGEN RABE, JURGEN GRONEN and PIETER OOMS
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1995
Application No. 10/018,332
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 11 and 13 through 15 which are all of the
claims pending in the above-identified application. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
The subject matter on appeal is directed to flexible
polyurethane foams produced from polyisocyanates and particular
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007