The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HANS-UWE BAUMANN, DIETER SEMMEL and VASIL BARBUNOPULOS
____________
Appeal No. 2004-2060
Application No. 09/891,271
____________
HEARD: December 9, 2004
____________
Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 6 through 11. Claims 4 and
5, the only other claims pending in the application, stand
objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim and
have been indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent
form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007