Ex Parte Traktovenko et al - Page 6




              Appeal No. 2004-2072                                                               Page 6                
              Application No. 10/036,678                                                                               


              that a tool can be received into the openings and utilized to manipulate the wedge                       
              portion relative to the brace member are not disclosed by Brendel.                                       


                    The examiner asserts (answer, pp. 12-13) that:                                                     
                    Brendel shows the brace portion 12 having an opening (area circumscribed by                        
                    element 14) and also shows the wedge portion 9 having an opening 10 (see                           
                    figures 1-4). Brendel further shows the openings being situated (see figure 3)                     
                    such that a tool can be received by them for manipulating the wedge portion 9                      
                    relative to the brace 12. Importantly, opening 10 is shown as an elongated slot                    
                    having a bolt 11 situated therein. Even when, as Appellant argues, the Brendel                     
                    device is "locked in position'' as shown in figure 3, the openings are situated                    
                    such that a tool can be received by them for manipulating the wedge portion 9                      
                    relative to the brace 12. That is, a tool can be used to manipulate the bolt 11                    
                    such that it slides within the opening 10 (see column 5 line 58 - column 6 line 6),                
                    allowing relative movement between the wedge 9 and the brace 12.                                   
                           ln the alterative, the Examiner points out that the bolt 11 may properly be                 
                    considered a "tool'' which can be received in the openings, thus allowing for the                  
                    wedge portion 9 to be manipulated, relative to the brace 12 (see figures 1-3).                     
                    This alternative understanding also anticipates the claim as currently recited.                    


                    The language of claim 26 requires that the opening of the brace member and the                     
              opening of the wedge portion be capable of being situated such that a tool can be                        
              received into the openings and utilized to manipulate the wedge portion relative to the                  
              brace member.  In our view, when the Brendel device is positioned as shown in Figure                     
              3, the openings are situated such that a tool can be inserted therein, however, there is                 
              no certainty that such a tool so positioned is capable of manipulating Brendel's wedge                   
              portion 9 relative to his brace member 12 as pointed out by the appellants in their                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007