Appeal No. 2004-2097 Application No. 09/501,013 subject matter are recited in representative claim 1, the sole independent claim on appeal, reproduced below: 1. A sound and heat insulation material, comprising: a core layer including fibrous material and having at least one outer surface, said fibrous material being provided with a fire retardant additive; and a covering layer including a foamable material covering said core layer at said at least one outer surface, said foamable material being at least difficult to ignite and foaming at a given temperature to insulate said core layer from high temperature and oxygen. The examiner relies on the following prior art reference as evidence of unpatentability: Murch 3,934,066 Jan. 20, 1976 Claims 1 and 3 through 22 on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Murch. (Answer at 3-7.) Because the examiner has not adequately established a prima facie case of anticipation against the appealed claims, we reverse. “To anticipate a claim, a prior art reference must disclose every limitation of the claimed invention, either explicitly or inherently.” In re Schreiber, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1 The final rejection of claim 2 has been expressly withdrawn. (Examiner’s answer mailed Aug. 27, 2003, paper 12, p. 2.) 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007