Appeal No. 2004-2228
Application No. 09/652,002
We thus agree with appellant that Salvati does not support the examiner’s finding
of anticipation with respect to any of claims 1-6, 8, 17-22, and 28-35.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1-6, 8, 17-22, and 28-35 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being
anticipated by Salvati is reversed. The appeal as to claims 9, 10, 13-16, and 23-27
stands dismissed.
REVERSED
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ROBERT E. NAPPI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007