Ex Parte Gott et al - Page 4




               Appeal No. 2004-2247                                                                       Page 4                
               Application No. 09/835,701                                                                                       


               Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936-37 (CCPA 1976); In re Malagari, 499                          
               F.2d 1297, 1303, 182 USPQ 549, 553 (CCPA 1974); see also In re Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325,                          
               1329, 65 USPQ2d 1379, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2003).                                                                     
                      We next turn to the argument directed to viscosity.  Appellants acknowledge that                          
               Albacarys discusses viscosity (Brief, p. 7).  But Appellants contend that Albacarys emphasizes                   
               increasing the viscosity of the chemical composition deposited on the substrate without a                        
               teaching of how viscous the material should become (Id.).  Appellants argue that it would appear                 
               to the ordinary skilled chemist that the higher the viscosity, the better the results whereas                    
               Appellants have found that not to be the case (Id.).  According to Appellants, Albacarys does not                
               appreciate the importance of a critical viscosity range and does not convey such to those of                     
               ordinary skill in the art (Id.).                                                                                 
                      Again, we do not agree with Appellants’ interpretation of the Albacarys reference.                        
               Albacarys discloses several ways in which to increase viscosity so that the skin care actives in the             
               composition remain substantially on the surface of the substrate (Albacarys, col. 48, l. 51 to col.              
               49, l. 53).  That is not a teaching of increasing viscosity without limit, rather, it is a teaching of           
               increasing viscosity so the desired location on the substrate is maintained.  There would be no                  
               need to increase viscosity beyond the point at which the composition remains on the surface.                     
               Albacarys is simply indicating that viscosity is a variable to be optimized through routine                      
               experimentation.                                                                                                 
                      Here, the claimed viscosity range of about 100 to about 200,000 cps encompasses a wide                    
               range of viscosities.  Albacarys describes a substantially dry cleansing product with the same                   
               basic structure as that claimed, i.e., a substrate impregnated with a cleansing composition                      
               containing a lathering surfactant and water.  The cleansing product is used in the same way, i.e.,               
               by wetting the dry article with water and contacting the skin with the article.  Viscosity is                    
               understood to have an impact on properties of the product (Albacarys, col. 48, l. 51 to col. 50, l.              
               23).  Optimization of viscosity would have been within the skill in the art.  In such a situation a              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007