Appeal No. 2004-2261 Page 11
Application No. 09/494,690
Since all the limitations of independent claims 4, 10 and 20 are not suggested by
the applied prior art for the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to
reject claims 4, 10 and 20, and claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 12 dependent thereon,
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 to 6, 8 to 12 and
20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007