Appeal No. 2004-2294
Application 10/002,343
and of Miyoshi and Nishino with appellants’ countervailing evidence of and argument for
nonobviousness and conclude that the claimed invention encompassed by appealed claims 1
through 4 and 8 through 21 would have been obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a).
The examiner’s decision is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960
(August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)).
AFFIRMED
- 8 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007