The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROCH J. TOLINSKI and STEVEN J. ENGELGAU ____________ Appeal No. 2004-2346 Application No. 09/876,519 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, MCQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4, 6- 14, 16-18 and 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Claim 2 was canceled and claims 1, 4 and 16 were amended subsequent to the final rejection in an amendment filed August 2, 2002 (Paper No. 5). We REVERSE.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007