Ex Parte Gao - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-2355                                                        
          Application No. 09/935,721                                 Page 2           

          pattern of the pen movement.  The iron particles remain until               
          removed via another mechanism, such as by way of a sliding                  
          mechanism that erases the tracing made with the pen.  A further             
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of             
          exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                               
                    1. A magnetic dispersion medium, comprising:                      
                    a bulk material,                                                  
                    a first colorant, wherein said first colorant is                  
               titanium dioxide,                                                      
                    a second colorant, wherein said second colorant is                
               benzo oxazole fluorescent whitener,                                    
                    a thickener, and                                                  
                    a magnetic material.                                              
               Claims 1-6 and 12-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,             
          first paragraph as being based on a non-enabling disclosure.                
          Claims 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                
          paragraph, as being based on a non-enabling disclosure.  Claims             
          1-6 and 10-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                   
          paragraph as lacking written descriptive support in the                     
          application, as filed.                                                      
               We refer to the brief and to the answer for a complete                 
          exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by appellant and            
          the examiner concerning the issues before us on this appeal.                









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007