Ex Parte WASSOM et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written       
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                

                                                                                   Paper No. 44           

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                              ____________                                                

                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                
                                               ____________                                               
                                Ex parte JACK WASSOM, RENEE SCHAEFER                                      
                                           and CORY CHANDLER                                              
                                               ____________                                               
                                           Appeal No. 2004-2363                                           
                                         Application No. 09/224,211                                       
                                               ____________                                               
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                 
                                               ____________                                               
            Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
            NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            



                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
                  This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 7, 8, 35     
            and 36.  Finally rejected claims 1, 2, 4 to 6, 9 to 19, 24 to 30, 32 to 34, 37 to 47 and 52   
            to 78 are pending but have not been appealed.  Claims 3, 20 to 23, 31 and 48 to 51            
            have been canceled.                                                                           


                  We AFFIRM.                                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007