The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GARY T. KETCHUM ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0015 Application No. 09/788,274 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FRANKFORT, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We AFFIRM. BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a detector responsive to leakage of liquid from the urethra in urological investigations of the female bladder and urethra (specification, page 1). Appellant’s specification discloses two embodiments of thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007