The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WOLFGANG BRAUER, WOLFGANG KAUFHOLD, FRIEDEMANN MULLER, JURGEN WINKLER, HERBERT HEIDINGSFELD, WOLFGANG ROHRIG, and HANS-GEORG HOPPE ____________ Appeal No. 2005-0020 Application No. 09/572,225 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRATZ, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1-9, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007