Ex Parte Stockman - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0050                                                        
          Application No. 10/143,261                                                  
               a plurality of electrically controlled gauges mounted to               
          said housing, each said gauge having a variable display value               
          corresponding to an aircraft condition;                                     
               a processor contained in said housing, said processor having           
          outputs electrically connected to said gauges for controlling the           
          display value of each said gauge, said processor being programmed           
          to simulate gauge display values corresponding to predefined                
          malfunctions of an aircraft; and                                            
               means mounted to said housing and electrically connected to            
          said processor for varying the time duration from initiation of a           
          simulation and before initiation of the simulated malfunction.              
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1 through 8 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent No. 4,599,070 to            
          Hladky et al. (Hladky).                                                     
               Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 12) and to the           
          final rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 6 and 13) for the                    
          respective positions of the appellant and the examiner regarding            
          the merits of this rejection.1                                              
                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Hladky discloses an aircraft flight simulator comprising a             
          pilot’s console 20, an instructor’s console 22 and a computer 24.           
          The pilot’s console includes a number of flight controls and                

               1 In the final rejection, claims 1 through 8 and 10 also               
          stood rejected under both the first and second paragraphs of 35             
          U.S.C. § 112.  The examiner has since reconsidered and withdrawn            
          these rejections (see Paper No. 9).                                         
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007