Ex Parte Norkus et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-0072                                                        
          Application No. 09/656,351                                                  

               a thimble comprising:                                                  
                    a metal thimble base having a flange and an internally            
               threaded post projecting from the flange, and                          
                    a plastic hollow thimble stem, said stem and said base            
               having mating means for securing said stem to said base,               
               said stem having projecting from a top end thereof a                   
               plurality of fingers spaced about a periphery thereof, each            
               of the fingers having an outwardly projecting portion                  
               defining a circumferential lip having an outer diameter                
               larger than the inner diameter of the shoulder of the spacer           
               tube of said spacer; and                                               
               wherein the stem is telescopically receivable in the spacer            
          tube such that when the stem is fully inserted in the spacer                
          tube, the lip engages the shoulder in a snap fitted arrangement.            
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Mason                        72,409                 Dec. 17, 1867           
          Mansel                       4,118,134              Oct.  3, 1978           
          Tillman et al.               5,031,266              Jul. 16, 1991           
          (Tillman)                                                                   
          Norkus                       5,570,867              Nov.  5, 1996           
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as follows:  (a) claims 1, 2, 4-6, 8-11 and 31 over Norkus; (b)             
          claims 12, 14, 15, 18, 19, 24, 25, 27-29 and 33 over Norkus in              
          view of Tillman; (c) claims 13, 17, 20, 21 and 23 over Norkus in            
          view of Tillman and Mason; and (d) claim 22 over Norkus in view             
          of Tillman, Mason and Mansel.                                               
               We have thoroughly reviewed the respective positions                   
          advanced by appellants and the examiner.  In so doing, we find              
          ourselves in agreement with appellants that the examiner has                
                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007