Ex Parte Chong et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                  today was not written for publication and is not                    
                          binding precedent of the Board.                             



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                           Ex parte JOSHUA ANTHONY CHONG,                             
                   VINCENT JOHN FAROZIC, RICHARD MARTIN JACOBSON,                     
                      BRET ALAN SNYDER, RANDALL WAYNE STEPHENS                        
                               and DAVID WAYNE MOSLEY                                 
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 2005-0075                                  
                             Application No. 09/951,049                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     

          Before KIMLIN, PAK and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6, 8,           
          9 and 11.  Claim 10 has been allowed by the examiner whereas                
          claim 7 stands objected to as being dependent upon a rejected               
          claim.  A copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this                  
          decision.                                                                   

                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007