Appeal No. 2005-0077
Application No. 10/293,545
readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. In re
Ludwig, 353 F.2d 241, 243-44, 147 USPQ 420, 421 (CCPA 1965).
As a final point, we note that appellant bases no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results, which would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness
established by the examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner's decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
TERRY J. OWENS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK:clm
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007