The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MICHAEL CLARY and DONALD DEUTERMAN __________ Appeal No. 2005-0096 Application No. 09/765,098 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Michael Clary et al. appeal from the final rejection (mailed December 8, 2003) of claim 1. Claims 3 through 5, the only other claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b). THE INVENTION The subject matter on appeal relates to “an articulating chair and, more particularly, to an improved fabric cover and refined knock-down frame which are quickly assembled to form aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007