Appeal No. 2005-0097
Application No. 09/645,172
III. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejections of claims 5 and 24 as
being unpatentable over Ubillos in view of Rosenberg and
Kinoshita, and of claims 6 and 25 as being unpatentable over
Ubillos in view of Rosenberg, Kinoshita and Goldberg
As Kinoshita and Goldberg, considered either individually or
in combination, do not cure the above noted shortcomings of
Ubillos and Rosenberg with respect to parent claims 2 and 21, we
shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of
dependent claims 5 and 24 as being unpatentable over Ubillos in
view of Rosenberg and Kinoshita, or the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 6 and 25 as being
unpatentable over Ubillos in view of Rosenberg, Kinoshita and
Goldberg.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 through 6, 9
through 13, 21 through 25, 28 through 32, 39 and 40 is reversed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007