Findings of Fact F. 1. This interference is between U.S. Patent 5,752,945 to Mosley et al. and reissue Application 09/314,492 of Dodge et al. Paper 1. F. 2. The Mosley patent issued from Application 08/846,003, filed 25 April 1997. F. 3. The Dodge application is a reissue of Dodge Patent 5,820,973. Application 09/314,492, Declaration for Reissue Patent Application For Richard Norris Dodge, IL F. 4. Dodge was accorded the benefit of the 22 November 1996 filing date of Application 08/754,417, which issued as the Dodge Patent. Paper 89, p.24. F. 5. The sole count of this interference is Count 2 Claim 1 of Mosley patent 5,752,945 or Claim 25 of Dodge Application 09/314,492 wherein said at least one first surge layer and said at least one second surge layer are bonded together. Paper 90. F. 6. The claims of the parties which correspond to Count 1 are: Dodge 25-29 Mosley 1-10 Paper 90. F. 7. The claims of the parties which do not correspond to Count 1, and therefore are not involved in this interference, are: Dodge None Mosley None Paper 90. F. 8. Dodge Claims 25-29 were included in Application 09/314,492 to provoke an interference with the Mosley patent. Application 09/314,492, Declaration for Reissue Patent Application For Richard Norris Dodge, II, p. 2. F. 9. Dodge Claims 25-29 were said to be "copied or substantially copied from Mosley's involved patent for the purpose of interference." Application 09/314,492, Declaration for Reissue Patent Application For Richard Norris Dodge, II, p. 2. -2-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007