0, Interference No. 104,798 Paper 110 Harris v. Dobrusin Page 2 FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the administrative record of Harris's 6,150,373 patent and of Dobrusin's 09/623,737 patent application. RICHARD E. SCHAFER BOARD OF Administrative Patent Judge PATENT RICHARD TORCZON APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES MARKNAGUMO INTERFERENCE Administrative Patent Judge TRIAL SECTION cc (electronic mail): Counsel for Harris (Hoffman-La Roche Inc.): Stephen M. Haracz and Kevin C. Hooper of BRYAN CAVE LLP. Counsel for Dobrusin (Warner-Lambert Co.): Rudolf E. Hutz and Ashley 1. Pezzner of CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & H UTZ. Notice: Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral agreements referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of the interference, shall be in writing and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office before termination of the interference as between said parties to the agreement or understanding. 35 U.S.C. 135(c); 37 C.F.R. § 1.661.Page: Previous 1 2Last modified: November 3, 2007