The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 84 Filed by: Motions panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-308-7953 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS ANDINTERFERENCES MAILED] BANGALORE A. NAGARAJ ET AL., MAR 0 2 2004 Junior Party, U.S. EPATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (Patent 5,427,866) BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCE$ V. DAVID S. RICKERBY ET AL., Senior Party. (Application 08/608,502) Patent Interference No. 104,817 Before: SCHAFER, CRAWFORD, and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge Judgmen In our Decision of Preliminary Motions mailed concurrent with this paper, we made the determination that all of the Nagaraj and Rickerby involved claims are unpatentable over prior art.Page: 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007