InterferenceNo. 104,835
Genise v. Desautels
For the reasons given in the Decision on Priority (Paper No. 107), it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of the sole count, Count 1,
is herein entered against junior party THOMAS A. GENISE, RONALD K. MARKYVECH and
JAMES R. McREYNOLDS;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party THOMAS A. GENISE, RONALD K.
MARKYVECH and JAMES R. McREYNOLDS is not entitled to its application claims 35-38,
41-43, 45, 47 and 49 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion panel's May 22, 2003 decision on preliminary
motions (Paper No. 71) is merged herewith for purposes ofjudicial review;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDER-ED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties.
fired E. McKelvey, Senior
Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF PATENT
eson Lee APPEALS
/ým d inis tj AND
ministrative Patent Judge
INTERFERENCES
Mate
Administrative Patent Judge
- 2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007