0 Interference No. 105,009 We found in our "DECISION ON PRELIMINARY MOTIONS" filed on even date with this judgment that the preliminary statement of Craig et al., the junior party, failed to overcome the effective filing date of Benneker et al., the senior party. Accordingly, it is appropriate to enter judgment against the junior party, Craig et al. It is ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1, the sole count in this interference, is entered against Andrew Simon Craig, Victor Witold Jacewicz and Michael Urquhart, the junior party. FURTHER ORDERED that Andrew Simon Craig, Victor Witold Jacewicz and Michael Urquhart, the junior party, are not entitled to claims 1 and 3 of their patent involved in this interference, U.S. Patent Number 6,063,927, and designated as corresponding to Count 1. FURTHER ORDERED that Andrew Simon Craig, Victor Witold Jacewicz and Michael Urquhart, the junior party, are not entitled to a patent containing claims 155 through 203 of their application for patent involved in this interference, Serial Number 09/469,902, filed on December 22, 1999, and designated as corresponding to Count 1. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007