MURAKAWA et al. V. WANG et al. V. WANG et al. - Page 1






                                                 The opinion in support of the decision being                                                  
                                             entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.                                              
                                                                                            Paper48                                            
                 Byi Trial Section Merits Panel                                                                                                
                         Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences                                                                             
                         U-S. Patent and Trademark Office Filed: 5 April 2004                                                                  
                         P.O. Box 1450                                                                                                         
                         Alexandria, VA 22313-1450                                                                                             
                         Tel: 703-308-9797                                                                                                     
                         Fax: 703-305-0942                                                                                                     
                                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                 


                                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                   
                                                        ANDINTERFERENCES                                                                       
                                          (Administrative Patent Judge Carol A. Spiegel)                                                       


                                               ALICE M. WANG, MICHAEL E. DOYLE                                                                 
                                                          and DAVID F. MARK                                                                    

                                                               Junior Party,                                                                   
                                                         U.S. Patent 5,219,727                                                                 
                                                         U.S. Patent 5,476,774                                                                 

                                                                      V.                                                                       

                                          GEORGE MURAIKAWA, R. BRUCE WALLACE,                                                                  
                                                 JOHN A. ZAIA and JOHN J. ROSS[                                                                

                                                               Senior Party,                                                                   
                                                         Application 07/402,450                                                                


                                                   Patent Interference No. 105,055                                                             


                 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           

                 SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge,                                                                                         


                                                           FINAL JUDGMENT                                                                      

                         I his interference was declared because an interference-in-fact was thought to                                        






                                                                    I                                                                          



Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007