BLUESTONE et al. V. LINSLEY et al. - Page 2





                                                                                 Interference No. 105,107                
                                                                                              Page No. 2                 
               Adverse Judgment, Paper No. 26). As Bluestone has requested adverse judgment, judgment on                 
               priority as to Counts 1-11 is entered against Bluestone. 37 C.F.R. § 1.662.                               
                      Upon consideration of the record, it is:                                                           
                      ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Counts 1-11, the counts in the interference, is            
               awarded against JEFFREY A. BLUESTONE, PHILLIP M. WALLACE, PETER S. LINSLEY,                               
               JEFFREY A. LEDBETTER, NITIN K. DAMLE and WILLIAM BRADY.                                                   
                      FURTHER ORDERED that JEFFREY A. BLUESTONE, PHILLIP M. WALLACE,                                     
               PETER S. LINSLEY, JEFFREY A. LEDBETTER, NITIN K. DAMLE and WILLIAM BRADY                                  
               is not entitled to a patent containing claims 39-49 of Bluestone, U.S. Application Serial No.             
               08/696,107, as they correspond to Counts I -11.                                                           
                      FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a                     
               paper number in the file of Linsley et a]., U.S. Patent No. 5,885,579 and Bluestone et al., U.S.          
               Application No. 08/696,107.                                                                               



                                   J=AMESON LEE                                                                          
                                          str ive                                                                        
                                   Administrative Patent Judge                                                           

                                                                             BOARD OF PATENT                             
                                   C dAR'OWL ! I E APPEALS                                                               
                                   Administrative Patent Judge AND                                                       
                                                                             INTERFERENCES                               

                                   MICHAEL P. TIERNEY                                                                    
                                   Administrative Patent Judge                                                           









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007