Interference No. 105,115
Lee v. Janzen
On February 2, 2004, an order was issued for junior party Lee to show cause why
judgment should not be entered against the junior party for failing to file a preliminary statement.
PaperNo. 30. The junior party has not filed a response. Accordingly, it is now appropriate to
enterjudgment. It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 shall be entered against
junior party BENJAMIN I. LEE;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party BENJAMIN 1. LEE is not entitled to its patent
claims 1, 11 -13, 16-18, 20, 37 and 3 8 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
n" eson Lee
Administrative Pate t Judge
7 BOARD OF PATENT
Sally (ýtdner Lane APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge AND
INTERFERENCES
Sally C. Vedl'ey
Administrative Patent Judge
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007