Interference No. 105,133
Fisher v. Prasad
ZHAO and JAROSLAW ZIEBA;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party PARAS N. PRASAD, JAYANT D.
BHAWALKAR, GUANG S. HE, CHAN F. ZHAO and JAROSLAW ZIEBA is not entitled to
its application claims 290-3 10 and 313-320 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent the senior party desires to abandon claims
additional to those corresponding to the count, it shall take that up with the primary examiner
after termination of the interference;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved
application or patent of the parties.
n Lee
C./Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF PATENT
Sally GalAnerLane APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge AND
INTERFERENCES
ŭaily-C- deŭrey
Administrative Patent Judge
- 2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007