Ex Parte MARSHALL - Page 2





                Interference No. 105,150                                                                                                    
                Petrides v. Marshall                                                                                                        
                        On December 15, 2003, junior party Petrides filed papers expressly abandoning its two                               
                involved applications 08/682,296 and 08/916,782. Those papers have now been entered into                                    
                respective associated application files. Per 37 CFR § 1.662(a), abandonment of a party's                                    
                involved application is regarded as a request for entry of adverse judgment. The request is                                 
                2ranted. It is                                                                                                              
                        ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count I is hereby entered against                                 
                junior party GEORGE H. PETRIDES;                                                                                            
                        FURTHER ORDERED that junior party GEORGE H. PETRIDES is not entitled to                                             
                claims 1, 7-9 and 13-16 of its involved application 08/682,296 which correspond to Count 1, and                             
                also is not entitled to claims 1-5, 8-11 and 14-16 of its involved application 08/916,782, which                            
                correspond to Count 1;                                                                                                      
                        FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                                    
                the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and                                                              
                        FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved                                    
                application or patent of the parties.                                                                                       












                                                                     2                                                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007