Interference No. 105,152 Paper 24 Iwase v. Hamada Accordingly, it is: ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1, the sole count in the interference, is awarded against senior party Hamada; FURTHER ORDERED that senior party Hamada is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1, 2, 4, 6-8, 11, or 12 (corresponding to Count 1) of application 08/864,909; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of U.S. Patent 6,207,759 and application 08/864,909; FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 3 5 U. S. C. § 13 5 (c) and 3 7 CFR § 1. 66 1. AICHARD ý. SCHAFEY Administrative Patent Judge BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND CAROL A. SPIEVJELY INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCE TRIAL SECTION -MARK NAGUMO,,-ý/ Administrative Pactitiudge 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007