MENTZ et al. V. SCHAEFER et al. - Page 2





                              Accordingly, it is                                                                                                                                  
                              ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count I (Paper 1, p. 5),                                                              
                    is awarded against the junior party, ALCOA, INC.;                                                                                                             
                              FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, ALCOA, INC., is not entitled to a patent                                                                         
                    containing claims 27-28' (corresponding to Count 1) of Application 09/473,246;                                                                                
                              FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment and a copy of the ORDER - RULE                                                                         
                    634 (Paper 43, entered August 20, 2004) be made of record in the file of Patent 6,017,657 and in                                                              
                    Application 09/473,246; and                                                                                                                                   
                              FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not been filed,                                                                   
                    attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.                                                                                               




                                                   (ýZA ý- 34                                                                                                                     
                                                   RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                                                                                             
                                                   Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                                    



                                                                                                       BOARD OF PATENT                                                            
                                                  /AMESON LEE APPEALS AND                                                                                                         
                                                (/ýdministrative Patent Judge )INTERFERENCES                                                                                      



                                                   MARK NAGUMO                                                                                                                    
                                                   Administrative Paten aJge                                                                                                      







                                         Application 09/473,246 also includes pending claims 1-4 and 7-25 which were designated as not                                            
                     corresponding to the count. Paper 1, p. 5. Those claims are not involved in this interference and, therefore, are not                                        
                     effected by this judgment. Any further prosecution of those claims is at the discretion of die examiner.                                                     
                                                                                     -2-                                                                                          







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007