IL
Interference No. 105,185 Paper 17
Schering Corp. v. Shionogi & Co., Ltd. Page 2
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Schering Corp. is not entitled to a patent
containing claims 36-40 and 50-53 of Schering Corp.'s 08/799,028 application, which
correspond to one or both of counts I and 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that this interference be remanded to the administrative
patent judge designated to handle the interference for further action not inconsistent
with this decision; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision be entered in the
administrative record of Schering Corp.'s 08/799,028 patent application and of Shionogi
& Co., Ltd.'s 09/043,861 application.
4ICHA1111 E. JSCHAFER
Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF
PATENT
APPEALS AND
RICHARD TORCZON k" INTERFERENCES
Administrative Pa)ent Judge
INTERFERENCE
TRIAL SECTION
SALLY GARDNER LANE
Administrative Patent Judge
cc (facsimile):
For Schering Corporation: Immac J. Thampoe and Michael G. Biro Of SCHERING
PLOUGH CORPORATION (Fax: 908-298-5388).
For Shionogi & Co., Ltd.: Stephen B. Maebius and George E. Quillen of FOLEY&
LARDNER (Fax: 202-672-5399).
Notice: Any agreement or understanding between parties to this interference, including any collateral
agreements referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the i termination of the
interference, shall be in writing and a true copy thereof filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office
before termination of the interference as between said parties to the agreement or understanding. 35 U.S.C.
135(c); 37 G.F.R. § 1.661.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007