Interference No. 105,187
Patent Interference No. 105,187
JUDGMENT - RULE 41.204 (a)(3)
Before Metz, Schafer and Torczon, Administrative Patent Judges.
Metz, Administrative Patent Judg6
We found in our "DECISION ON PRELIMINARY MOTIONS" filed on
even date with this judgment that the junior party's preliminary
statement failed to overcome the earliest filing date accorded
the senior party in this interference. Accordingly, it is now
appropriate to enter judgment against the junior party. It is,
therefore,
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1,
the sole count in this interference, is entered against Falko
Giżnter Falkner, George Holzer and Friedrich Dorner, the junior
party, on the grounds that the junior party was not the first
inventor of the subject matter of Count 1.
ORDERED that judgment as tożthe subject matter of Count 1,
the sole count in this interference, is awarded to Stephen C.
Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell and Anthony C. Minson, the senior
party, on the grounds that the senior party is the first inventor
of the subject matter of Count 1.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007