0
Interference No. 105,194 Paper 7
Sano v. Stayton Page
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 5), the sole count
in the interference, is awarded against senior party PATRICK S. STAYTON;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party PATRICK S. STAYTON is not entitled to
a patent containing claims 27-28 (corresponding to Count 1) of Application 08/766,793;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this decision (Paper 7) be given a paper
number and entered into the administrative record of Sano U.S. Patent 6,022,951 and
of Stayton Application 08/766,793; and
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not
been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
1--7
RICHARD E. S
Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF PATENT
KICFıARD TOR&ZON APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Ju INTERFERENCES
CAROL A. 9PIEGEL
Administrative Patent Judge
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007