Ile opi4on in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper IS Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 29 March 2004 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES FAXED AMGEN, INC. (Glen F. Pierce, Regina M. Housley MAR 2 9 2004 and Charles F. Morris), Junior Party PAT. & TM. OFFICE s3OARD OF PATENT APPEALS (Patent 5,814,605), ANDINTERFERENCES V. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as Represented by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (Jeffrey S. Rubin, Paul W. Finch and Stuart A. Aaronson), Senior Party (Application 08/477,983). Patent Interference No. 105,199 JUDGMENT - RULE 662 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges, SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judize. Amgen, Inc. has filed a paper requesting entry of an adverse judgment in this interference under 37 CFR § 1.662(a). Paper 17. Accordingly, it isPage: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007