Interference No. 105,201
R. Ingram v. A. Ingram
FURTHER ORDERED thatjunior party RUPERT INGRAM is not entitled to claims I
3, 10, 17 and 19-22 of its involved patent;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party ANTHONY INGRAM is not entitled to claims
18-22 of its involved application;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
/J96neson Lee
'Administrative Patent Judge
BOARD OF PATENT
Sally C. Wdley APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge AND
INTERFERENCES
R'6a Nagumo
Administrative Patent JYge
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007