The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JANET SCHWARTZ
____________
Appeal 2003-2019
Reexamination 90/004,933
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 28, 2006
____________
Before OWENS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
On July 12, 2006, Appellant filed a Request for Rehearing of our
Decision of May 28, 2004. Because an Amendment to the claims
accompanied Appellant’s Request (Amendment of July 12, 2004), we
remanded the Reexamination Proceeding to the Examiner for purposes of
determining whether entry of the Amendment was appropriate and further
action if necessary (Remand of August 23, 2004). Appellant then withdrew
the Amendment and a Second Amendment in favor of a Third Amendment
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007