The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte PIERRE JEANVOINE,
TANGUY MASSART, RAMON R. CUARTAS,
ARMANDO R. RODRIGUES and
JUAN-ANDRES NUNEZ HERNANDEZ
________________
Appeal No. 2004-1028
Application No. 09/381,631
________________
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
________________
Before HARKCOM, Acting Chief Administrative Patent Judge, WILLIAM F. SMITH,
Administrative Patent Judge, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Per Curiam.
On May 28, 2004, counsel for the appellant filed a Request for Continuation
Examination (RCE) under 37 CFR § 1.114. Pursuant to the Notice entitled, "Request for
Continued Examination Practice and Changes in Provisional Application Practice," 65 Fed. Reg.
50092, 50095 (Aug. 16, 2000), and the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.114(d), a Request for
Continued Examination under 37 CFR § 1.114 filed after appeal has been taken, but prior to a
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007