Interference 103,781
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written
description requirement)(Paper No. 154);
denying Adang’s request for leave to file a preliminary
motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(a) for judgment that Claim 40 of
Fischhoff’s Application 08/827,906, filed May 3, 1995, is
unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph (written
description requirement)(Paper No. 154);
denying Adang’s request for leave to file a preliminary
motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(1) to redefine the interfering
subject matter by excluding Claims 2, 3, 5-7, 9, 10, 13 and 14
of Adang’s U.S. Patent 5,380,831 from this interference (Paper
No. 154); and
denying Adang’s request for leave to renew or amend a motion
under 37 CFR § 1.635 said to have been filed earlier “for
discovery under 37 CFR § 1.687(c) Re: Derivation of Invention”
(Paper No. 154).
June 3, 2003 - Adang filed a Request For Reconsideration
(Paper No. 166) of the APJ’s Decision And Order On Proposed
Preliminary And Miscellaneous Motions And Requests, dated May 20,
2003 (Paper No. 164).
June 5, 2003 - An APJ entered a Decision On Adang’s Request
For Reconsideration (Paper No. 168), granting-in-part and
-173-
Page: Previous 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007