Interference 103,781
(2) Claims 13-14 of Adang’s involved U.S. Patent 5,380,831,
issued January 10, 1995, are designated as not corresponding to
new Count 2;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, judgment on priority of the
invention of new Count 2, the sole count in this interference,
is awarded against Senior Party MICHAEL J. ADANG, THOMAS A.
ROCHELEAU, DONALD J. MERLO, and ELIZABETH E. MURRAY;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, judgment on priority of the
invention of new Count 2, the sole count in this interference,
is awarded against Junior Party KENNETH A. BARTON and MICHAEL J.
MILLER;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, judgment on priority of the
invention of new Count 2, the sole count in this interference, is
awarded in favor of Junior Party DAVID A. FISCHHOFF and FREDERICK
J. PERLAK;
FURTHER ORDERED that, on the record before the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences, Senior Party MICHAEL J. ADANG,
THOMAS A. ROCHELEAU, DONALD J. MERLO, and ELIZABETH E. MURRAY is
not entitled to a patent containing Claims 1-12 of U.S. Patent
5,380,831, issued January 10, 1995;
-195-
Page: Previous 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007